But assuming your scene is fairly static, stitching will give much superior results if done properly. Some scenes are best taken with a single shot, especially if there are many moving elements that can cause stitching problems. You can easily get superior results from a stitched pano using a moderate quality regular wide or normal lens compared with the most expensive and high quality ultra-wide angle lens, assuming the scene allows. The final Gigapixel Macro Photograph is provided as a high-resolution print-ready image file, and an online URL, for exploration, research, archiving, and. Can also go the other way and combine shots with the same object multiple times in the final pano to get rid of moving objects like cars or people using median filter or by masking. Also naturally combines with image stacking, e.g.Naturally combines with HDR or exposure fusion to tame high contrast scenes.Image quality, no worries about corner sharpness or vignetting if you use sufficient shot overlap and photometric optimisation during assembly Using image editing software such as PTGui and Autopano Giga, the team stitched together the images and created 360 degree panoramic images as instructed by.Resolution, gigapixels relatively straightforward nowadays Autopano recognizes and can assemble data obtained through a fisheye lens, so you are able to build equirectangular, 360 x 180 spherical panoramic interactive images with a minimum number of. If you understand this, you will have the answers to your questions, and you will probably remember the answers much better because you will understand them. Do you think it's possible for software to do that without using the two top rows at all? Now imagine the stitched panorama, and you take away the top two rows. Then I used programs Autopano Giga/Kolor Panotour Pro - two mouse clicks and. If you don't know what that is, look it up. Then I used the PhotoShop but I do not really like it. If you really want to understand this, try it with pencil and paper and see what needs to be done. I guess that would be difficult with stitching. I had fond memories of using the XPAN for street photography. If like to think it could be fixed in settings as otherwise the stitching is absolutely seem less and the resolution using the original images is pretty spectacular.I thought by pointing the camera slightly up or down (to avoid the horizon cutting through the middle of the frame) would cause the overall horizontal plane to bow up or down with distortion. Right at the bottom the swirl is so tight that it looked like a dark splodge (hence my thinking it was another hole).Īlso, as you say, the horizon is wrong, it curls upwards. Also an adjustment will need to be made to pano to create a flat horizon when stitching the. If you imagine a circle, everything from 12 o'clock to 6 o'clock swirls anti clockwise and everything from 6 oclock to 12 oclock swirls clockwise. Autopano Video Pro works in conjunction with Auto Pano Giga. My test image was shot directly above a tree and when you look down directly on the tree everything swirls around. For use with Autopano Giga 4, we have made linear panoramas (horizontal shifts only) and multi-angle panoramas (with several images in a vertical movement, in addition to the horizontal shift). I've checked again and they are blacks gaps at the top - which does kind of make sense as you say, but its a shame that the software can't stretch and blend the image to fill the gap.Īs for the bottom, it's not a gap as such, but the image is kind of 'swirled'. Autopano Giga 4 can handle a lot of images in one panorama, so theres no need for caution just take your time and shoot methodically in order to avoid extra post processing work. If you are getting gaps at the bottom, i wonder, have you imported all the photos from SD card? Also horizon wasn't flat so some tweaking needed there (if I knew how!) Not as good at stitching as Fly or PTGui and a couple more steps to go through but no gap at bottom. I presume that top gaps are filled by AI within Fly app, but there shouldn't be bottom gaps as the camera can take a shot of directly underneath. I get gaps at the top, but not at the bottom.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |